User:ThatIPEditor/Essays/On RfAs

Problem 1
The community have absolutely no say about whether if a user should have administrative rights. I think, because administrators serve the community, and becomes arbitrators, the community should have a say, by the form of objects.

The solution
I think that regular users should be able to object to RfAs, and administrators should consider them before granting sysop rights, and regular users should be able to question the potential administrator. In addition, the votes from the administrators should be public, for reconsideration. (see below)

Examples: Object: This user has not gained sufficient experience. ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 18:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Weak objection Meh, this user is evil and will go rogue in 5 seconds if they get triggered. ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 18:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

The problems with my solution
This idea takes privileges from the current administrator's hands and requires them to consider more factors, which is something that apparently they do not particularly enjoy.

Problem 2
There is no official reconsideration procedure, and they all need to be done personally, such as mine.

The solution
I think that we should have a official time for reconsidering a person's adminship, which should take place the same time as arbcom elections, by creating a page, which regular users should be able to comment on, and object, if they do not believe that the administrator has done such a good job, and at the end, the other sitting administrators would vote on the administrator, regarding whether if they should retain adminship.

The problems with my solution
There are no viable problems with this, other than the extra work :D