Hypixel SkyBlock Wiki talk:Role Applications/Archive 4

RfA for ThatIPEditor (Talk · Contribs)
Full disclosure:

Nomination

 * ThatIPEditor. He's really nice and knows his stuff with coding and templates. He actually has motivation to complete his goals and is a active former Wikipedia Editor. He's also getting ranks faster than I can process. Also in tense situations on the wiki he knows what how to deal with people unlike me who somehow screws up stuff by breathing. Also his edits are really high-quality which what matters to me the most. -CreeperSPG

Co-Nominators

 * ThatIPEditor, WoW. He is such a good person as I have gotten to know him myself. One of the big things I think a admin should have it them is kindness, I have seen nothing less then kindness from him. Also I have looked threw most of his edits and they are topnotch quality. They range from the creation of articles to simple categorizing. He likes to set high goals for himself, and accomplishes them without any excuses what so ever. He is active on the wiki like 24/7. I feel like if Administrator is granted to him the wiki will be a even better place. -DivaSlift
 * ThatIPEditor. He is pretty nice, and is pretty good at coding. He is extremely active, and has been the fastest growing guy. He sets high goals, (Like 100) and somehow manages to complete them. I'd say he's a pretty good fit for Admin. -YakuzaMC
 * He is a very mature and well grounded person. I believe that he will make a good due to his technical skills, passion for the wiki, and most importantly, temperament and sense of judgement. In my time on the wiki, I have seen many people, both good and bad, but he is one of the best I have seen. He knows how to handle and act on wiki, which is crucial. I have to make a note that this request is a bit rushed, and time is needed to know the wiki by heart. But overall, I would say he would make a very good.

Acceptance of nomination
I accept this nomination. I have never edited for pay, used any other account in the past, and never had any blocks, other than an abuse filter block on January 15th, 2021 and have been revoked by Thundercraft5. ThatIPEditor (Talk · Contribs) 01:25, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Feel free to post questions for the candidate here.

Attending Administrator response

 * Hello ThatIPEditor,


 * With respects to guidelines on appointing new, a minimum of 80% majority of an approval of a Request for from existing  must be achieved before you may receive the rank. We will be casting the vote and making the decision in private and a follow-up response will be made once we have made a decision.


 * Thank you for your request.


 * All right, sounds good!ThatIPEditor (Talk · Contribs) 01:35, 26 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello ThatIPEditor,
 * Hello ThatIPEditor,


 * This is the follow-up response as promised in my previous message above, and unfortunately the Admins have decided that your application will have to be put on hold.


 * We feel that you, as a contributor to the Wiki and however eager you may be to be an, will need more time to gain our trust as well as gain more experience within our wiki.


 * I hope that even with your request put on hold, you would still contribute to the Wiki like you currently are as a . We've been quite impressed with your skills that are actively demonstrated within our Wiki, please keep it up!


 * As such, please do take more time in considering what I have left here, and if you have any questions, I believe you know where to find any of us.


 * Thank you for your request. 09:03, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Per the follow-up, I would like to state that the general consensus in the review disucssion did not find many issues besides your lack of time on the wiki. I would also like to commend you on your abilities as an administrator and technical abilities.

Looks like it's done ThatIPEditor (Talk · Contribs) 20:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Nominating WooperIsBest for Content Moderator

 * I would like to nominate for . I have known WooperIsBest for quite a while, and mostly communicated over the discord. WooperIsBest have almost 300 edits and all of them have been in good faith. They have been around for more than 4 months already. I see no obvious reason to hold WooperIsBest's  permissions. ThatIPEditor (Talk · Contribs) 06:51, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Awaiting user response.
 * I accept this nomination. Thank you so much, it's an honor!
 * {WooperIsBest} - {Talk} - {Contribs} - {Activity}



14:14, 28 January 2021 (UTC) seems to be done ThatIPEditor (Talk · Contribs) 04:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

New request for user rights by
I have requested user rights for the rank of. Thanks, DreamLogic (talk) 22:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I believe I should receive this rank because I'll be able to help moderate the wiki, I'll be able to help moderate comments and such, and I'll be able to help organize pages. I'm learning more and more about templates on this wiki each day, and I'm able to develop pages and full working UIs. I edit on this wiki because I find it fun and enjoy helping out.
 * The following Users support me in this request: and.


 * ( Non-administrator comment ) I also support this request ThatIPEditor (Talk · Contribs) 23:20, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Your edits look amazing, accepted!

== New request for user rights by ==

I have requested user rights for the rank of. Thanks,  Roguemarine2 ( talk | contribs )  | Never Gonna Give You Up,  | Never Gonna Let You Down. 03:19, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I Believe I should receive this rank because: I want to be able to delete unnecessary pages and be able to lock pages that I believe are high traffic/frequently vandalized and I could do things like that if I was a content moderator.
 * The following Users support me in this request: None


 * ( Non-administrator comment ) You must have Rollbacker rights to apply for content moderator rank. ThatIPEditor (Talk · Contribs) 23:16, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ( Non-administrator comment ) But with your edit count, I think you can still keep it here, and a admin would likely grant you both. ThatIPEditor (Talk · Contribs) 23:18, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Your status looks good!

New request for user rights by
I have requested user rights for the rank of. Thanks, DivaSlift (talk) 00:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I Believe I should receive this rank because I am active on the wiki daily and check articles and blog posts to make sure they stay on topic, and have no inappropriate content. Whenever I am reading threw and articles comments, most of the time I will see and inappropriate comment, or a comment that doesn't follow wiki guidelines. If I where to be granted discussion moderator I could quickly deal with those messages instead of going threw the whole reporting process then waiting till the comment gets looked at. I know that I wasn't able to get and this is a huge step up, but I think I will be able to do this. (:
 * The following Users support me in this request: Dreamlogic


 * You have edited for a long enough time in my opinion regardless of the thoughts of staff, You have shown considerable improvement. Consider your request accepted! P.S. I also gave you.

Nomination of Cycloneshadow1 for Discussions Moderator.
I would like to nominate for Thanks, YakuzaMC (中国人和美国人) (talk) 19:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I Believe they should receive this rank because they are active on the discussions, and try to help out as much as they can. I feel that they deserve this rank, for they have almost 1500 discussions posts. There is no reason to withhold the rank of from them.
 * The following Users support me in this request:


 * Awaiting user response.
 * No response received, granting rights.

New request for user rights by
I have requested user rights for the rank of Content Moderator Thanks, CreeperSPG (talk) 20:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I Believe I should receive this rank because I'm decently active on the wiki and been on the wiki for quite a while (since may). Also I know templates and a bit of source editing. I also have 409 edits and 3k discussion posts. While, I'm mostly a moderator, I feel I can also moderate pages as I have experience dealing with vandals and stuff(check the discord #reports). Also since the last time we have discussed about me getting content mod, I have significantly matured. Also it was my bad for instigating on the Diva revoking situation and I promise I will not do something like that again.
 * The following Users support me in this request: Nobody


 * You look good, even if you had some beef earlier. Consider your request accepted!

New request for user rights by
I have requested user rights for the rank of. Thanks, Studers (talk) 22:00, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I Believe I should receive this rank because I will try my best to make the hypixel wiki a better place. Since I have gotten advice I know what to do. This will help me else benefit from all my mistakes. I will be helpful, online, and polite on the wiki. I know I don't have the best amount of edits, but i think I will be a very good
 * The following Users support me in this request: (none)


 * You have barely the amount needed for, and your edits are of low quality. Your maturity is also questionable. Please review the requirements for and improve your editing skills/maturity before requesting again.

New request for user rights by
I have requested user rights for the rank of Thanks, YakuzaMC (中国人和美国人) (talk) 01:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I Believe I should receive this rank because I usually very active, and have many edits. Although many of them are fixing small grammatical errors, some are also big information additions. I am also familiar with the Deletion and Protection Policy. I have been on this wiki for a long time, and I try to help this wiki as much as possible. I also know a bit about templates. (Oh yeah btw srry for the double request. First was cycloneshadow1 fyi)
 * The following Users support me in this request:



Nominating Lunatic Lunala for Content Moderator

 * I would like to nominate for . I do not know Lunatic Lunala very well, but I think that they would be a good  because of their good edits and maturity. From their edits, it seems like they know templates and edit well. Also I had checked their comments and other logs and it seems like they well matured. Also not to mention they have 539 edits  CreeperSPG (Talk · Contribs) 06:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Done

New request for user rights by
I have requested user rights for the rank of. Thanks, DirtzBlock (talk)
 * I Believe I should receive this rank because im an active player, editor and member of the community itself. While my edits on this forum might be not that high yet, i'm actively supporting other forums as well and have good experience with HTML/Source Editing, Moderation of Members and Posts/Contributions and locating vandalism/plain mistakes. Hope to be able to contribute more in the future and maybe get a part of the staff team at some point as well!
 * The following Users support me in this request: I don't know any of the other people well enough to go to them and beg for that, so i will just keep this empty. More of the lone wolf


 * Your edits look good, welcome to the team!

== New request for user rights by ==

I have requested user rights for the rank of. Thanks, {WooperIsBest} - {Talk} - {Contribs} - {Activity}
 * I Believe I should receive this rank because I have an advanced knowledge of both the usage and the creation of, HTML and CSS , and some knowledge of Lua Modules. I am excellent at learning new things, and I can learn nearly anything that I need to.
 * The following Users support me in this request: Probably some people but I didn't ask anyone :)

21:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Welcome to the technical team! As you now have access to Sitewide JS/CSS, the following help pages should be read before modifying any sitewide JS/CSS.
 * Help:Customization_policy
 * Help:Advanced CSS and JS
 * Help:CSS_best_practices
 * Help:Community_CSS_and_JS
 * Help:Syntax_highlighting
 * Help:JavaScript_review_process
 * Help:Personal_CSS_and_JS
 * Help:Including_additional_CSS_and_JS
 * Help:CSS_and_JS_pages

RfA for Pa3kP7 (Talk · Contribs)
Full disclosure:

Nomination

 * I would like to nominate Pa3ckP7 for sysop rights. I have worked with him for a long time. I have only been here for a month, and Pa3ckP7 have been here for way longer. He is also a code editor, and have a vast knowledge about how this wiki operates. If I can get sysop, he can too. ThatIPEditor (Talk · Contribs) 22:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Users who support this RfA
ThatIPEditor (Talk · Contribs) 22:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Acceptance of nomination
I accept my nomination and I am aware of it -User:Pa3ckP7

Statement from the candidate
I was considering this option for a long time, but didn't want to bear the burden of blocking people without a specified document guide, but I have noticed that on my online times there is very little admins to handle appeals and User:ThatIPEditor was kind enough to nominate me when I was seriously starting to consider putting in a RFA myself.

Attending Administrator's Response
Hello Pa3ckP7, with respect to |the guidelines, a minimum of a 80% majority is needed for your request to be accepted. We are currently holding such a vote, and will get back to you in a few hours. Hello! The admins have voted and the result was to promote you to a Administrator! Thank you very much, and welcome to the Admin team! :D ThatIPEditor (Talk · Contribs) 20:00, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

New request for user rights by
I have requested user rights for the rank of. Thanks, DreamLogic (talk) 01:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I Believe I should receive this rank because not only could I help edit pages, but moderating comments and discussions as well.
 * The following Users support me in this request:


 * Your edit record looks excellent, granted!

RfA for WooperIsBest (Talk · Contribs)
Full disclosure:

Nomination

 * I would like to nominate WooperIsBest for sysop rights. WooperIsBest is a very mature, knowledgable person. I think WooperIsBest would benefit greatly from sysop rights. ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 19:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Users who support this RfA

 * ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 19:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Pa3ckP7
 * YakuzaMC
 * Thundercraft5
 * DivaSlift

Acceptance of nomination
I acknowledge this nomination. Thank you! {WooperIsBest} - {Talk} - {Contribs} - {Activity}

19:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Statement from the candidate
I am already a, , and , and I know Regular Expressions and both the creation and usage of Templates. I have excellent grammar and maturity, and I created the Recent Changes Patrol. In all, I believe that becoming an administrator can greatly help the wiki.

{WooperIsBest} - {Talk} - {Contribs} - {Activity}

19:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Attending Administrator's Response

 * Hello WooperIsBest, Thank you for requesting to be an ! As per the |The policy, we are currently holding a vote to decide whether this request will be accepted.
 * Per the previous reply, we have decided to grant you ! The vote was unanimous, welcome to the team!

New request for user rights by
I have requested user rights for the rank of. Thanks, &#123;DivaSlift&#125; - &#123;Talk&#125; - &#123;Contribs&#125; - &#123;Activity&#125; (talk) 15:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I Believe I should receive this rank because ... When I was false banned my discussion moderator and rollbacker where taken away from me, but that is besides the point. I have joined the recent changes patrol and ever since I have reverted lots of unnecessary edits or vandalism. If I where to have RollBacker I could quickly and easily revert edits, I know I could do the same thing with the undo but but the tools that come with role backer will make it quicker and more efficient. I have also stopped categories editing, the only time I have added a categories is if the article truly needed that specific categories. I personally believe that my article editing skills and improved and I can tell right from wrong a lot better on the wiki. I know I probably shouldn't be reapply for a rank so quickly but I truly believe that I have improved.   -->
 * The following Users support me in this request:


 * You have been found of edit warring, we will resume this request once your block expires.

== New request for user rights by ==

I have requested user rights for the rank of. I was previously quit as of the DivaSlift drama and personal issues. I'm currently returned and as the combat and Bartender's Brewery updates are rolled out, there are much more new contents, while comes up with the increasing of fully protected pages. It is inconvenient that I have to request an active content mod for editing those pages. As my activity will retain for at least a month, I would like to re-apply for. Thanks, User:Southmelon Special:UserProfileActivity/Southmelon • Special:Contributions/Southmelon • Message_Wall:Southmelon 14:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Done, welcome back to the staff team!

RfA for Dreamlogic (Talk · Contribs)
Full disclosure:

Nomination

 * I would like to nominate Dreamlogic for sysop rights. Dreamlogic has recently come to my user talk page, asking about the criteria, and well, for someone with 2k edits, and 2 months, definitely deserves sysop rights. Well, I got nominated at 1 month and 1k, so, someone with 2k and 2 months should definitely know the wiki better. ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 05:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Users who support this RfA

 * ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 05:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC) * WooperIsBest, Thundercraft5, GloriousCraft

Acceptance of nomination
I accept this nomination! Thanks for nominating me!Dreamlogic (talk) 06:48, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Attending Administrator's Response
On hold until user accepts nomination. ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 05:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Still on hold until voting between the sitting administrators have been done per adminpol. ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 21:36, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

New request for user rights by
I have requested user rights for the rank of Discussions Moderator. Thanks, TheColdSheepIsBad (talk) 16:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I Believe I should receive this rank because ... I like helping answering questions and I am fairly active on the wiki.
 * The following Users support me in this request:


 * Your maturity is questionable, and your post count is not very high, please respond to this request when you feel you have enough posts and are mature enough.

RfA for GloriousCraft (Talk · Contribs)
Full disclosure:

Nomination

 * Hello! I would like to nominate GloriousCraft for adminship. Although their Edit Count isn't that high, I believe that they truly need it. GloriousCraft has made numerous reports over discord, and they are all good reports, that I have blocked. I believe adminship is a tool.  One does not become an admin if they do not need the tool. I see no reason why GloriousCraft should not receive adminship. - ThatIPEditor Say hi! • Contribs 19:55, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Users who support this RfA

 * - ThatIPEditor Say hi! • Contribs 19:55, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Xd21lord (talk) 21:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Xd21lord (talk) 21:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Xd21lord (talk) 21:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Xd21lord (talk) 21:29, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Acceptance of nomination
I accept this nomination, thank you!   GloriousCraft (💬 |📝 ) Signed on

Statement from the candidate
My technical skills aren't great, but this could make me a more community-oriented admin, managing appeals and reports. I have a good knowledge of Regular Expressions and am already a and. I have great maturity, and I think I would contribute to the admin team as I could block vandals, instead of creating the large backlog of reports every day.

Attending Administrator's Response
The nomination has passed with a 5/6 (83%) approval rate. Welcome to the admin team!